Mobile continues to deliver for William Hill

TAGs: mobile gaming, Playtech, William Hill, William Hill Online

William Hill retail shopWilliam Hill’s mobile net revenue increased by 300% as Q3 results echoed the gaming industry trend of moving towards mobile. Mobile sports betting turnover grew by 250% as William Hill Online was their knight in shining armor. Net revenue for the joint venture with Playtech was up 28% with operating profit declining by a disappointing 7% to £24.5m. The company’s sportsbook saw stakes up 51% with in-play turnover of 61% accounting for much of this. In terms of the disruption at WHO, the release states: “The Board is confident William Hill Online has tightened its control of the operation as a result of this change.”

Q3 is always a good set of results for bookies with the start of the English football season in August, reflected in a 24% increase in amounts staked on football at retail counters. In a sign that they’re not leaving retail behind, chief executive Ralph Topping commented: “In the UK, we will be trialling second-generation Storm gaming machines, new self-service betting terminals and high-definition video walls in the shops before the end of the year.”

The success at WHO and over the counter football stakes was offset by a 22% decline in operating profit put down to increased online investment and the loss-making telephone arm. News on the Probability takeover was included with news they can apply for another extension under takeover rules. It means the 14th November is not so much a deadline as a reminder to make sure they’ve extended on time. If they end up taking the Swedish firm under their wing, it will further strengthen a mobile offering that has become one of the key cogs driving their online operation. The group is on track to meet expectations for the year and, but for a minor hiccup in Israel, WHO is putting in a five star performance. To this end, the iPhone should be included in King Ralph’s end of year honors list. William Hill (Knight) hood? Why yes Sire.


views and opinions expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of