Gambling dominates UK list of priciest (and misspelled) paid search keywords

TAGs: google adwords, Keywords, Search engine optimization

gambling-uk-paid-search-keywordsGambling-related subjects dominate a recent list of the most expensive (and occasionally misspelled) keywords in the UK’s paid search market.

On Thursday, Search Engine Watch published a list of what it claims are the 100 most expensive keywords in the UK online market. The list was gleaned from a SEMrush dataset of 12m keywords and the average price paid for each on Google AdWords during March 2016.

Topping the list at a whopping £148.51 per click was the phrase “play live blackjack.” In fact, gambling-related terms occupied the entire top-10, all but three positions in the top-25, and 77 out of the entire 100-strong list.

Even the three non-gambling positions in the top-25 are only technically out of step with the pack. All three are lumped into the ‘finance’ category, and the highest ranked of these (at #12) is ‘spreadbetting offers’ (£118.03). To find a truly non-gambling/finance product, you have to go all the way down to #28, when ‘big data systems’ (£97.76) makes an appearance.

Hysterically, the second most expensive keyword is ‘rolete’ (£144.76) which paints a rather unflattering picture of gamblers as being jonesing so bad for a chance to spin the roulette wheel that they’re unable to spell and/or type.

Roulette appears to post particular challenges for online gamblers, as the (not really) words ‘rullet’ (£111.62) and ‘roulet’ (£107.10) also make the top-25. Premature matriculation appears to have contributed to ‘online cas’ (£128.67) making the charts at #6, while the similarly linguistically-challenged ‘online casion’ and ‘casnio’ also make the cut.

While the list abounds with variants of casino, roulette, blackjack, slots and ‘live’ versions of same, there’s not a single reference to poker in the top-100. For that matter, there’s no reference to betting outside of the aforementioned financial products. The full list is viewable below.



views and opinions expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of