Paraguay betting monopoly struggles with unauthorized sites


paraguay-online-betting-monopoly-competitionParaguay’s online gambling monopoly is kicking back less than $4m to the government on an annual basis, a situation the gambling regulator blames on unauthorized competition.

This week, José Ortiz, head of Paraguay’s National Gambling Commission (Conajazar), revealed that the online sports betting monopoly was contributing about G2.1b (US$325k) per month to the state treasury, which works out to around $3.9m on an annual basis.

Paraguay has a population of only around 7m residents, but Ortiz (pictured) justified the government’s paltry online betting returns from on the activities of at least three unauthorized online gambling operators. Ortiz singled out one of these companies as Crown City, which operates the domain (pictured behind Ortiz).

Crown City’s parent firm, Montego Trading, operated under a Conajazar permit until last year, when’s parent Daruma Sam S.A. was awarded a five-year betting monopoly despite suggestions that the government and Ortiz’s predecessor at Conajazar had rigged the tender to ensure Daruma Sam won the prize.

Crown City’s land-based operations were raided shortly after the monopoly took effect despite Montego Trading appealing the constitutionality of Conajazar’s decision. This August, Paraguayan prosecutors filed illegal gambling charges against two Crown City representatives and another from Enfield, which operates the Apostamina betting brand in similar defiance of’s supposed monopoly.

This week, Ortiz bemoaned the regulator’s lack of official powers to “combat” unauthorized online competition and urged parliament to pass legislation “that adapts, updates and modernizes a law that is already quite obsolete.”

Paraguay’s football market was thrown into chaos this month after local media revealed that Marco Trovato, president of the Asociación Paraguaya de Fútbol (APF) champs Olimpia, also operates a payment processor that had an exclusive deal to handle payments.

Trovato’s dual role represented an apparent violation of FIFA rules that prohibit members from having “any interests, either directly or indirectly” in betting operations. The APF’s other clubs have demanded that stop taking wagers on their matches.

This week, Trovato accused the APF of seeking to control betting for themselves, citing a 2017 document in which the league sought to be named the sole body with the right to the “economic exploitation” of football wagering. The APF rejected Trovato’s claims, saying it was only seeking to “defend the commercial, economic and intellectual property rights” of its members.