Brazil’s Senate schedules December 7 gambling bill vote

brazil-senate-gambling-vote

brazil-senate-gambling-voteBrazil’s Senate will vote on the country’s new gambling legislation in the first week of December.

Last week, Brazilian senators approved the final language of the 186/2014 legislation that will legalize multiple forms of gambling, including land-based casinos, bingo parlors, the ‘jogo do bicho’ lottery and sports betting, as well as ill-defined forms of “electronic bets.”

On Thursday, Senate President Renan Calheiros said the upper house will cast its final vote on 186/2014 on December 7, thereby ensuring the bill’s fate will be known before the seasonal parliamentary recess begins on December 22, possibly setting Brazilians up for the best Christmas ever, or giving another country a reason to call December 7 ‘a day that will live in infamy.’

Brazil’s lower house, the Chamber of Deputies, was supposed to vote on its rival gambling bill 442/1991 on Wednesday. However, in the kind of luck that has typified Brazil’s gambling liberalization for years now, the session was suspended before any votes were taken when between 50 and 60 demonstrators invaded the chamber.

Local media reported that the unwelcome guests had been protesting cuts to social programs outside the Chamber, but somehow managed to elude security personnel and gain access to the chamber floor. Chamber vice-president Waldir Maranhão had no recourse but to declare the session suspended and ask security to restore order.

It’s unclear whether the Chamber has the votes to pass 442/1991, as one group of lawmakers made a formal request this week to prevent the bill coming up for a vote, based on their belief that legal gambling will have “a negative impact on society.”

The Catholic Church has (surprise) also come out against the two gambling bills, with the National Conference of Brazilian Bishops (NCBB) issuing a statement calling on the people to rise from their stupor, contact their elected representatives to demand they vote against the measures. The NCBB says a ‘no’ vote is the only way to prevent “irreparable moral, social and family damage.” And locusts. Can’t forget the locusts.