US Department of Justice now says Wire Act applies only to sports betting

Steven Stradbrooke
December 23, 2011
26 Comments

DoJ-Wire-Act-sports-bettingIn a dramatic about-face that could have sweeping implications for the online gambling industry, the US Department of Justice now says that the 1961 Wire Act applies only to sports betting. It has long been the stated opinion of the DoJ that the Wire Act prohibited all forms of interstate gambling that took place over the internet, but a new opinion issued by the Assistant Attorney General Virginia A. Seitz states that “interstate transmissions of wire communications that do not relate to a ‘sporting event or contest’ fall outside the reach of the Wire Act.”

The opinion, first made public by Forbes’ Nathan Vardi, was issued on Sept. 20, 2011, in response to a 2009 request for clarification by New York State’s lottery division and the Illinois governor’s office regarding their plans to sell lottery tickets online to residents of their respective states. These plans would have involved the temporary transmission of data outside state lines to out-of-state transaction processors. The DoJ’s Criminal Division felt such a plan would violate the Wire Act, but worried that such a conclusion created conflicts with the provisions of the 2006 Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act (UIGEA), which specifies that “unlawful internet gambling” does not include bets “initiated and received or otherwise made exclusively within a single State,” and expressly provides that “[t]he intermediate routing of electronic data shall not determine the location or locations in which a bet or wager is initiated, received, or otherwise made.”

After considering this contradiction, Seitz came to the following conclusion: “Because the proposed New York and Illinois lottery proposals do not involve wagering on sporting events or contests, the Wire Act does not, in our view, prohibit them. Given this conclusion, we have not found it necessary to address the Wire Act’s interaction with UIGEA, or to analyze UIGEA in any other respect.”

To support the opinion, Seitz quoted Herbert Miller, former Assistant Attorney General, Criminal Division, who, when Congress was conducting hearings in the 1950s into the relationship between gambling and organized crime, told a Senate hearing that the Wire Act would not apply to lottery-style ‘numbers’ betting because the Act “is limited to sporting events or contests.” Seitz observed that it was reasonable to conclude that the “ordinary meaning of the phrase ‘sporting events or contests’ does not encompass lotteries.”

The question now becomes, what else does the Wire Act not encompass? Poker? Casino games? Will the DoJ now do a similar about-face vis à vis its stance on the ‘poker is a game of luck, not skill’ argument to reclassify poker as a sporting event? Does PartyGaming’s Anurag Dikshit, who pled guilty in 2008 to violating the Wire Act, now file suit against the DoJ for the return (plus interest) of the $300m fine he paid?

DOJ REPONDS TO KYL AND REID LETTER
Not long after the Seitz opinion became public, the DoJ issued a letter addressed to Senators Harry Reid (D-NV) and Jon Kyl (R-AZ) that responded to the senators’ July 14 letter requesting clarification on the DoJ’s stance towards the legality of online gambling in the US. The DoJ’s letter states that the Seitz opinion “provides much needed clarity to those state governments that would like to permit wholly in-state, non-sports internet gambling, including internet lotteries.”

Attempting to save a little face, the letter went on to say the opinion “will not undermine the Department’s efforts to prosecute organized criminal networks. The significant majority of our current and past prosecutions concerning internet gambling involve cases where the gambling activity is part of a larger criminal scheme … Futhermore, in states that ban various forms of gambling – including internet poker – the Department will be able to investigate and prosecute those gambling businesses under the UIGEA and other sections of the criminal code. Of course, if Congress wishes to give the federal government greater enforcement authority over non-sports-related internet gambling, it could do so by amending the Wire Act.”

The timing of this opinion’s appearance and the DoJ’s reponse to Kyl/Reid — coming as it does the day after the Nevada Gaming Commission approved its online poker regulations — is interesting, to say the least. It will no doubt spur more individual states to follow the lead of Nevada and the District of Columbia to get on board the intrastate online poker train. State politicians that were skittish over the DoJ’s protracted silence are suddenly a lot less intimidated. State lotteries — at least, in those states in which poker is not expressly illegal — would appear to be major winners, here. Not surprisingly, the American Gaming Association issued a statement saying (what else) that this was all the more reason to pass federal poker legislation, but we detect a slightly more urgent tone to their message this time.

It’s a habit for governments to release embarrassing information to the press on the Friday before a long weekend, in the hopes that the ensuing media attention will go unnoticed by people away on holiday and not paying attention to nightly newscasts or reading newspapers. Suffice it to say, in this case, at least, fat fucking chance.

If you have any further information related to this story that you would like to share with us privately please click here.

Can't get enough CalvinAyre.com? Follow us on Twitter and Facebook, then you'll never miss out on the latest gaming industry news.

Share
Tags: Anurag Dikshit, Article, Department of Justice, Lottery, sports betting, Wire Act
Views and opinions expressed are those of the Author and do not necessarily reflect those of CalvinAyre.com
  • Calvin Ayre

    wow…this looks like a game changer.  It certainly does make our many year prediction that online gaming would roll out poker only and state by state not federally  seem a lot more like the real path.  I still maintain this is going to be a near decades long process not just a few years. 

  • http://twitter.com/#!/Brad_Leeb Brad Leeb

    Huge news. Interesting timing…. Happy Holidays!

  • http://calvinayre.com/2011/12/25/legal/present-from-doj-internet-lotteries-and-poker-are-legal/ DoJ Christmas Present: Internet Lotteries (and Poker?) Are Legal | Gambling News

    [...] administration has just declared, perhaps unintentionally, that almost every form of intra-state internet gambling is legal under federal law, and so may be games played interstate and even [...]

  • http://calvinayre.com/2011/12/27/business/calvin-ayre-2012-gambling-industry-predictions/ Calvin Ayre’s 2012 Predictions for the Gambling Industry | Gambling News

    [...] US Department of Justice’s ‘White Friday’ admission that the Wire Act didn’t extend beyond sports betting, I was on record as predicting no positive momentum for online gambling legislation at the federal [...]

  • http://calvinayre.com/2011/12/28/lifestyle/calvinayre-com-visitors-are-perverts-and-lushes/ CalvinAyre.com Visitors Enjoy Boobies, Parties | Lifestyle News

    [...] Friday was clearly (at least until the White Friday pre-Christmas DoJ Wire Act flip-flop) the year’s dominant story in the online gambling biz, so it’s no real surprise that our first [...]

  • http://calvinayre.com/2011/12/28/business/states-plan-online-gambling-following-doj-wire-act-reversal/ States Scramble In Wake of DoJ Wire Act Reversal | Online Gambling News

    [...] to the US Department of Justice’s pre-Christmas bombshell that the Wire Act applies only to sports betting, potentially clearing a path for states to legalize online versions of non-sports [...]

  • http://calvinayre.com/2011/12/29/business/doj-wire-act-reversal-could-be-reversed/ Future US Administrations Could Reverse DoJ Wire Act Reversal | Online Gambling News

    [...] of Justice’s pre-Christmas announcement that the Wire Act didn’t apply to anything other than sports betting. Connecticut Governor Dannel P. Malloy is taking a more liberal interpretation of the DoJ opinion [...]

  • http://calvinayre.com/2011/12/29/business/sikkim-pushes-india-central-government-for-online-gambling/ Sikkim Keeps Pushing For Online Gambling in India | Gambling News

    [...] gambling terms, America just witnessed a seismic power shift from the federal government to state governments. Online gambling fans in India are no doubt hoping [...]

  • http://calvinayre.com/2011/12/29/business/betfair-reports-fixing-christmas-hurdle-technical-fault/ Betfair Reports Fixing Christmas Hurdle ‘Technical Fault’ | Online Gambling News

    [...] by some UK-listed gaming companies on Wednesday following the US Department of Justice’s pre-Christmas Wire Act reversal tapered off on Thursday. After gaining 23% on Wednesday, Bwin.party fell half a percentage point on [...]

  • http://calvinayre.com/2011/12/30/legal/dojs-wire-act-reversal-means-barton-bill/ Legal News | What the DOJ’s reversal on the Wire Act really means

    [...] U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) recently surprised everyone with a written legal opinion on the meaning of the Wire Act. It was a surprise because the DOJ has been saying for years that the Wire Act prohibits all forms [...]

  • http://calvinayre.com/2012/01/03/legal/doj-wire-act-reversal-has-states-tribes-foreign-nations-pondering-options/ States, Tribes and Nations Respond to DoJ Wire Act Reversal | Online Gambling News

    [...] wake of the US Department of Justice’s pre-Christmas admission that the Wire Act applies only to sports betting, New Jersey state Sen. Raymond Lesniak says he may attempt to push a last minute online gambling [...]

  • http://calvinayre.com/2012/01/03/business/doj-reversal-wont-add-long-term-shareholder-value-for-public-companies/ No Value for Public Co’s from DoJ Wire Act Reversal | Online Gambling News

    [...] of folks were smiling widely following the US Department of Justice’s pre-Christmas confession that they’d been, uh, mistaken in their longtime public stance that the 1961 Wire Act applied to [...]

  • http://calvinayre.com/2012/01/04/legal/doj-poker-hysteria-enduring-importance-of-well-placed-comma/ The DoJ, Poker Hysteria, and Well-Placed Commas | Legal News

    [...] Over the holidays, the poker advocates, pundits, associations and online gaming lawyers have worked themselves into a froth. The cause? The US Department of Justice released an Opinion (dated September 20, 2011, but which became public in late December) regarding its interpretation of the scope of the Wire Act. [...]

  • http://calvinayre.com/2012/01/05/poker/british-full-tilt-poker-players-urged-by-alderney-to-contact-police/ Poker News | Full Tilt Poker players urged regulators contact police

    [...] topic for some time, there was no mention of Groupe Bernard Tapie’s November agreement with the US Department of Justice and Full Tilt’s previous shareholders to acquire the company for $80million. Nor did the [...]

  • http://calvinayre.com/2012/01/08/business/llinois-lottery-bounces-checks-iowa-lottery-jackpot-intrigue/ Illinois Lottery Bounces Checks; Iowa Lottery Intrigue | Gambling News

    [...] affected as an apology. It’s worth nothing that when the US Department of Justice issued its seismic new opinion on the limitations of the 1961 Wire Act, it was responding to inquiries by two state lotteries that [...]

  • http://calvinayre.com/2012/01/09/business/martin-report-short-term-boost-of-doj-opinion-fading-for-us-gaming-stocks/ Gambling News | Short Boost of DOJ Opinion Fading for US Gaming Stocks

    [...] recent Department of Justice opinion that the 1961 Wire Act applies only to sports gambling sent shockwaves through the gaming world. [...]

  • http://calvinayre.com/2012/01/16/business/investing-the-hard-way-a-look-at-dover-downs/ Dover Downs Shows Challenges Facing Smaller Publicly Traded Operators

    [...] course, Reid’s bill went nowhere, and it was not until last month’s DOJ opinion that American online poker became a legal possibility. That begs the question: if international [...]

  • http://calvinayre.com/2012/01/20/legal/states-salivating-over-doj-internet-gambling-flip-flop/ US States Salivate Over DoJ Flip-Flop | Online Gambling News

    [...] legislatures, governors, lottery directors, lottery vendors and gambling vendors of all types, the DoJ flip-flop on what types of gambling was prohibited by the Wire Act is also “fucking golden”. The [...]

  • http://calvinayre.com/2012/01/21/business/zynga-having-active-conversations-with-online-gambling-partners/ Zynga’s Conversations with Potential Real Money Partners | Online Gambling News

    [...] was just days ago that Zynga CEO Mark Pincus admitted that the US Department of Justice’s flip-flop on the scope of the Wire Act had changed his social game company’s stance regarding offering real-money gambling in addition [...]

  • http://calvinayre.com/2012/01/24/business/playtech-affirms-its-ready-for-global-expansion-while-its-venture-with-scientific-games-falls-apart/ Business News | Playtech boast future revenue surges

    [...] a share placing last November to finance acquisition opportunities. Now taking into account the DoJ’s Christmas surprise that that only online betting on sporting contests is unlawful, Playtech are living the dream. The [...]

  • http://calvinayre.com/2012/01/25/legal/us-senate-schedules-internet-gambling-hearing/ US Senate Schedules Online Poker Hearing; No House Hearing Date | Legal News

    [...] has announced its first substantive reaction to the Department of Justice’s pre-Christmas Wire Act clarification. The Senate Committee on Indian Affairs has scheduled a hearing for Feb. 9 at 2pm titled [...]

  • http://calvinayre.com/2012/01/26/legal/hawaii-introduces-online-gambling-bill/ Hawaii Introduces Internet Gambling Bill | Online Gambling News

    [...] gaming industry figure Sue Schneider got to her feet, referenced the US Department of Justice’s pre-Christmas conversion on the scope of the Wire Act, then asked Bwin.party.digital.whatsit co-CEO Jim Ryan whether he’d [...]

  • http://calvinayre.com/2012/01/31/legal/debates-gambling-legalisation-nebraska-and-connecticut/ Legal News | Nebraska and Connecticut lawmakers debate gambling

    [...] a view earlier this month that widespread online gambling is now inevitable in the state due to the U.S. Department of Justice’s Christmas present, adding that Connecticut should be ready. Is it [...]

  • http://calvinayre.com/2012/02/08/legal/black-friday-defendants-lose-motion-to-dismiss/ Black Friday Defendants Lose Motion to Dismiss Charges | Gambling News

    [...] A US federal judge has rejected motions by Black Friday defendants Chad Elie and John Campos to dismiss charges against them, clearing the way for a trial. In December, Judge Lewis Kaplan had stated it was “extraordinary unlikely that the entire indictment will be dismissed,” but on Jan. 26, Kaplan ordered all parties involved in the case to submit additional briefs to factor in any wrinkles that may have arisen as a result of the US Department of Justice’s pre-Christmas new opinion on the scope of the Wire Act. [...]

  • http://calvinayre.com/2012/02/10/legal/senate-indian-affairs-committee-online-gambling-hearing/ Senate Indian Affairs Committe Talks Online Gambling | Legal News

    [...] the past three months. This confab was called to hear testimony as to the Department of Justice’s revised opinion on the scope of the Wire Act, and, specifically, “What’s at Stake for Tribes.” Representing [...]

  • http://calvinayre.com/2012/02/19/business/doj-asked-to-clarify-bribery-stance-psycho-seniors-to-help-pass-japan-casino-bill/ DoJ Asked To Clarify Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Stance | Gambling News

    [...] on the Judiciary – have previously raised FCPA issues, but the DOJ’s dramatic pre-Chrstmas Wire Act about face may have convinced them that Holder is a slot machine that’s paying off, and they want [...]