BLACK FRIDAY: Calvin Ayre picks online poker’s winners and losers

Calvin Ayre
Calvin Ayre
April 26, 2011
26 Comments

Well, it’s been one week now since the Black Friday poker earthquake and the global online gaming industry tsunamis are still washing over all shores of this industry. Industry analysts like myself have been studying things closely since this started and I think I am pretty confident in predicting who the ultimate winners and losers are going to be in this affair. So, without any more fanfare, here is my current list, not necessarily in order, but I tried to rank them…and starting with losers:

THE LOSERS

1. The 11 guys indicted
These guys had it all. Now, they’re at the start of an epic battle with the US Department of Justice that could last for years and may result in them being wiped out financially and serving substantial jail time. After getting out, they would face a substantially different world and this will be hard on their friends and families also. Though I have personally been saying for years that anyone who thought poker was somehow “different” in the eyes of the DoJ was not actually listening to what they said. I have predicted for years that this DoJ move against poker was only a matter of time. It’s my opinion that these guys had all been drinking the Koolaid and really did believe that poker was somehow different. Not only is this massively shocking, it means these guys were likely not prepared in any way for this. For these reasons, it’s hard to find a bigger set of losers than these guys, and I genuinely feel sorry for them.

black-friday-calvin-winners-losers2. The US poker playing public
Most players lost the ability to play online (eCom restrictions in the US make it currently impossible for the few remaining small rooms to provide the capacity to ramp themselves up to take all these players), which will mean a massive change in lifestyle. Not only is online poker a great form of entertainment, it’s also a source of income for some. But to really poke them in the eye, rumors are now circulating in the industry that two of the indicted poker rooms do not have the funds to pay out all the players, suggesting that players are going to lose their balances. This was actually the original plan of the DoJ – take all the monies and teach the players a lesson – though they seem to have backed off this one.

3. The US Government and the DoJ
The reputations of both the US Government and the DoJ itself are being harmed by this move. In grabbing the domains of foreign companies and blocking their business globally instead of just blocking the domains like other countries do, the US has put itself at odds with the World Trade Organization and international trade agreements and law. There is no way anyone can argue that online poker in the US was a significantly pressing issue to warrant the DoJ’s response. I doubt if the guy in charge of making this decision thought through the implications of this before making this fateful decision. Additionally, by causing the players to lose all their money for playing online poker, something that is not illegal in most states in the US, the DoJ has created a political firestorm that will rage for years and will undermine the respect of Americans for the rule of law. Again, it seems this issue was not analyzed properly before this decision was made.

4. Shareholders of the indicted poker companies
All the companies are private so not much is known of share ownership structure, but shareholders are going to lose money even if their names are not on the personal indictment list.

missing-poker-pro-carton5. The mostly US poker pros
These guys are going to be hard pressed to replace this income. I also predict that the use of pros, which was already waning outside the big poker networks, is unlikely to ever regain its significance. I think this marks the end of the big money poker pro endorsements. The industry is going to slowly change to more of a focus on recreational poker players and these indictments will accelerate this transition.

6. The poker industry in general
For the near term at least, everyone who was benefiting in the past will take a loss. Land-based poker tournaments will see a reduction in entrants, which will require less staff to manage; the same will go for companies that produce TV poker shows; not to mention the effects felt by bloggers, training sites, agencies that represent pros… Few entities associated with poker will be spared some kind of hit.

7. Non-US facing online poker companies, especially the public ones
I got a laugh when shares in the European public companies that offer online poker went up the Monday after Black Friday. Apparently, nobody in this space really understands how this industry works. The likelihood of there being any federal regulation in the US has essentially been frozen for at least a decade. Since public companies trade on future potential, this should have caused their shares to drop. There is no way any small localized advantages may see inside Europe by the weakening of the major pure poker companies would compensate for this lost potential in the US.

In my eyes, the immediate and extremely unattractive gloating we saw from some European executives and their lawyers at what happened in the US is going to further diminish the reputations of these companies inside the industry, especially with me. I think that when the US does open up its market, it’s not likely these companies will ever get a fair shot at a US license — the US will always take care of US companies first. Then, to the surprise of nobody (except, based on their current statements, the executives of these European public companies), these same US companies will then start letting everyone outside the US play with them. It fits with the enduring US belief system, i.e. they are doing all the citizens of the world a favor, protecting them from companies in their own countries by letting them play with companies that are regulated in the good ole US of A.

8. Employees at the targeted poker companies
Some of them might take this opportunity to cut over to one of the other exciting brands in the online gaming space. I would recommend anyone using this as an opportunity to change companies to consider the opportunities in Asia. Asia is the largest gaming market in the world already and is also going to have the most explosive growth for the rest of the careers of anyone reading this. However, for the majority of the guys working for the poker companies, this will result in layoffs and worse paying jobs outside the industry. Its hard to imagine getting a better job outside this industry in Isle of Mann, Antigua, Costa Rica or even Ireland.

9. Founders and CEOs of small US-facing ant-sized poker rooms
They were all drinking the Koolaid and have a mountain of press out there with their chests all puffed out saying things that pretty much make them public enemy number one in the US now that the cover of the big boys is gone.

calvin-black-friday-winners

THE WINNERS!

1. Preet Bharara, the US Attorney in Manhattan and his team
It’s clear that even though the DoJ and the US Government are taking a reputational hit in this, Preet Bharara and his team will personally benefit. I would argue that it’s hard to find a more obvious motivation behind these indictments than the personal ambitions of a few government employees. There are political careers to be nurtured, and a bunch of juicy law and order headlines and convictions will undoubtedly enhance their electoral chances.

What’s more, without burrowing into the US banking system like the big poker rooms were doing – something that won’t happen again in light of these charges – it will be impossible to process the amount of money necessary for any other poker companies to replace the old powers. Poker in the US as we know it is effectively dead. This is the first time this has ever happened and Preet and his team will be keen to remind voters of this fact at some later date.

2. Land-based casinos who run poker tours, whether inside or outside the US
In the short term, some might win a bit and some will lose a bit, but not in any significant way. However, in the long term, when the US finally does open up, the big US casinos are definitely strongly in the ‘win’ category. It’s our prediction that these big US land-based casinos will be the only ones getting the new US online gaming licenses. What’s more, they will be opening in a less competitive market place with built-up demand, so it would be difficult for these companies not to win. And let’s not forget, when they do open up, they are not going to be restricted by that pesky idea that you should not let foreign residents avail themselves of the world’s safest online gaming products!

3. Private Asian gaming companies
These guys make massive money, count the biggest market in the world as their home turf, and do not face competition from the mostly public European companies who lack the structural flexibility to come into the Asian market. And these Asian companies have now had their only credible global competition decapitated. With the big money they have behind them, and the structural flexibility that comes with being private, its only a matter of time before these guys come out of the east like some reenactment of the ‘storm from the east’ that was the armies of the mighty Mongol Khans. Given time, they will become more sophisticated in branding and customer service and become a truly global force.

4. Non-US facing online poker companies
I realize I pointed out above how these companies will lose, but the truth is a little more nuanced. In the short term, they will experience some ‘winning’ in their existing markets as they face less competition for ad buys and might be able to reduce bonusing, etc. to recruit new players with the big poker rooms on their heels. However, these bonuses are dwarfed by the negatives I listed above.

5. Small companies that still take a handful of US players
They are not going to see much of an increase in business as they cannot process the eCom. However, with the big guys out of the market, bonuses and fees will rise making the small player base slightly more profitable. This is however loose change in comparison to what was shut down.

That said, the ultimate winners are (as usual)… Lawyers in the US! This means millions and millions of dollars in legal fees.

If you have any further information related to this story that you would like to share with us privately please click here.

Can't get enough CalvinAyre.com? Follow us on Twitter and Facebook, then you'll never miss out on the latest gaming industry news.

Share
Views and opinions expressed are those of the Author and do not necessarily reflect those of CalvinAyre.com
  • http://twitter.com/joeturbessi Joe Turbessi

    I'm still waiting for someone to acknowledge the fact that online poker has needed regulation especially for that younger adults who haven't yet fallen into this online poker world that has been no doubt been glamorized by the 8 figure monetary sponsorship ESPN has received from PokerStars and Full Tilt. What about them? Poker players need to forget about their wallets for a moment and think about how easy it was for people to play, esp for those who are younger (under 18/21), not allowed to gamble… yet they could log on at any time and be brought into this world, one that could stunt their growth worse than coffee or cigarettes ever could. WAKE UP poker world, it's not all about you… it's about future generations that could have potentially fallen to this. Granted online poker will most likely come back soon, but I hope that the government does more than just tax it and can find a way to put in place regulations that change the accessibility of this game. Before any of you poker players use your typical argument, “this guy just lost at poker”… GROW UP, I've been there, I was one of those kids years ago.. want to know more? Read the book “Into the Muck” … then we can talk.

    • http://twitter.com/joeturbessi Joe Turbessi

      why not consider those young kids as winners??

    • Jamie Mellor

      There's this odd group of people in the world, I think they're known as parents…

      But yes, why should they bear any responsibility for what their kids do? Let's just take away the pastime of hundreds of thousands (millions?) of Americans, not to mention the livelihoods of countless thousands more instead… Much better idea!

      Won't somebody please think of the children?!

      (for the record, I'm British, so can still play poker online whenever I wish – but I still think it's a joke for a country that considers itself the “land of the free” to be preventing it's citizens from spending their money on a recreational pastime like poker, in the privacy of their own homes)

    • http://CalvinAyre.com Calvin Ayre

      Dr Patrik Basham has a book out that is based on actual scientific study not quisi religious mumbo jumbo. His conclusion is that gambling is good for kids, gives them survival skills. Joe, your position just does not match up to science. Citizens need to be able to think for themselves in a free society. The US is not a free society, its more free in most places in the world, Costa Rica for instance. The issue really for Americans is when they are going to start forcing their government to leave them alone.

    • Prenut

      Joe – with all due respect your comments are uninformed and just flat out false. Full Tilt and PokerStars were/are both very proactive in preventing underage gambling. Does this mean that no underage players played there? No, it doesn't mean that either, but the assumption that 14 year old kids were running rampant on these sites is way off base.

      Calvin – Do you have any suggested reading about the history/current state of the Asian online gaming companies?

      • http://CalvinAyre.com Calvin Ayre

        I agree that all the major international companies are doing a good job of stopping underage players. But as Dr Basham points out based on his studies, this may in fact not even be a real issue. Joe just plain does not have a clue what he is talking about though, at any level.

        As for reading on what is happening in Asia in online gaming, there is not much out there. I think our site does as good a job as anyone on the net in covering it. However since its all private companies there is not much data. I know what I am talking about since I know many of the players personally. What is happening in Macau and Singapore is covered fairly well in the mainstream media though and give you the basic idea of market size. Its the largest gaming market in the world and will be for generations.

  • Pingback: gambling industry: Microgaming pulling out of the US

  • Pingback: Gaming industry: Anitgua calls Black Friday indictments illegal

  • Pingback: Gaming industry: PokerStars making payouts, Full Tilt mounting defence

  • Pingback: Calvin Ayre's Black Friday Winners And Losers | Online Poker News - Donk gambling

  • Pingback: Black Friday Defendant Rubin Arrested | Online Poker News

  • Prenut

    (tried to post this as a response to your last comment, but was unable to do so)

    Calvin while I don't necessarily disagree with the premise of gambling being good for building certain skills in young people, I think an argument like this has zero chance of gaining any traction with a governmental entity that is going to bring about change (or a large group of population that can make a difference). I don't assume but that you think that either – just seems a strange time to even bring the thought of younger people into the fray.

    As far as the Asian market, what do you suggest would be the best languages/dialect to learn to further a career in that market? I've worked with online gaming for awhile, and would be curious at least exploring the possibility of something in that market. I've had little desire to continue life in the states for quite some time, and recent developments have even furthered my desire to leave “the land of the free”.

    • http://CalvinAyre.com Calvin Ayre

      I don't think you will find anything about kids in the article I wrote….and I agree its not relevant in this thread, however the first post took the thread that direction. I am not wasting my time on this point further.

      Asia is Mandarin now.

  • Pingback: Anonymous

  • Pingback: Absolute Poker Investors Unsure It Can Survive | Online Gambling News

  • pokerclue

    So if you predicted that the DOJ would move against poker, why did you allow Bodog to stay US facing? You yourself are no longer the CEO, but are you not worried they will come after you as the founder?

  • Pingback: Gambling news: Bradley Franzen plead guilty to conspiracy charges

  • Pingback: Poker news | Black Friday not Europe’s saviour after all

  • Pingback: Weekly Gaming Industry News Recap April 24-30 | Online Gambling News

  • Pingback: Bank of Ireland Froze Full Tilt Account, Not DoJ | Online Gambling News

  • Pingback: Merge Gaming Network getting back in the game | Poker news

  • Pingback: Poker News – PokerScout.com’s Extortion Attempt

  • Pingback: CalvinAyre.com Visitors Enjoy Boobies, Parties | Lifestyle News

  • Pingback: Full Tilt Prompts Montreal Spat, Negreanu and Brunson Blogs | Online Poker News

  • Pingback: Gaming Industry | Our Little Secret | Poker News

  • Pingback: Ray Bitar Apologizes to Full Tilt Poker Players | Legal News